Comments on: http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/ Web Marketing Solutions Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:42:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Chris Stormer http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Chris Stormer Sun, 09 Jul 2006 20:49:00 +0000 http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/#comment-9 True, but it never hurts to spread the word. My interest has come over the past few weeks as I moved this specific blog over from www, it simply doesn't have a negative effect. As for the no-www.org, great site. I would also recommend checking out the plug-in for wordpress that makes it easy to make your wordpress blog no-www True, but it never hurts to spread the word. My interest has come over the past few weeks as I moved this specific blog over from www, it simply doesn’t have a negative effect. As for the no-www.org, great site. I would also recommend checking out the plug-in for wordpress that makes it easy to make your wordpress blog no-www

]]> By: psycomut http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/comment-page-1/#comment-8 psycomut Sun, 09 Jul 2006 20:47:13 +0000 http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/#comment-8 all my dns for my domains point to the server. no mail. or pop. or www. same box, 1 name. i really donot like going to a site to find i needed "www". sign of a lazy dns admin who does not link the root name to main page. all my dns for my domains point to the server. no mail. or pop. or www. same box, 1 name. i really donot like going to a site to find i needed “www”. sign of a lazy dns admin who does not link the root name to main page.

]]> By: B10m http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/comment-page-1/#comment-7 B10m Sun, 09 Jul 2006 20:45:39 +0000 http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/#comment-7 This is old news ... <a href="http://no-www.org/" rel="nofollow">http://no-www.org/</a> This is old news … http://no-www.org/

]]> By: Goplat http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Goplat Sun, 09 Jul 2006 20:41:15 +0000 http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/#comment-6 "Mail servers do not require you to send emails to recipient@mail.domain.com." Bad analogy. Mail servers are resolved through a special DNS query type (MX). When you send mail to someone@yahoo.com it does NOT go to the server yahoo.com, but actually to one of four servers named mxN.mail.yahoo.com. The Web may at the moment be the biggest use of the internet where you type in server names, but it is hardly the only one. Why should it get special treatment? “Mail servers do not require you to send emails to recipient@mail.domain.com.”

Bad analogy. Mail servers are resolved through a special DNS query type (MX). When you send mail to someone@yahoo.com it does NOT go to the server yahoo.com, but actually to one of four servers named mxN.mail.yahoo.com.

The Web may at the moment be the biggest use of the internet where you type in server names, but it is hardly the only one. Why should it get special treatment?

]]>