<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chris Stormer &#187; Web Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisstormer.com/history/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisstormer.com</link>
	<description>Web Marketing Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 17:55:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Lorem Ipsum &#8211; What is it?</title>
		<link>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/08/07/lorem-ipsum-what-is-it/</link>
		<comments>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/08/07/lorem-ipsum-what-is-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 02:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stormer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisstormer.com/2006/08/07/lorem-ipsum-what-is-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit&#8230;
There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain&#8230;
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry&#8217;s standard dummy text [...]<p><a href="http://chrisstormer.com/2006/08/07/lorem-ipsum-what-is-it/">Lorem Ipsum &#8211; What is it?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://chrisstormer.com">Chris Stormer</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit&#8230;<br />
There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry&#8217;s standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum. 	Why do we use it?</p>
<p>It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when looking at its layout. The point of using Lorem Ipsum is that it has a more-or-less normal distribution of letters, as opposed to using &#8216;Content here, content here&#8217;, making it look like readable English. Many desktop publishing packages and web page editors now use Lorem Ipsum as their default model text, and a search for &#8216;lorem ipsum&#8217; will uncover many web sites still in their infancy. Various versions have evolved over the years, sometimes by accident, sometimes on purpose (injected humour and the like).</p>
<p>Where does it come from?<br />
Contrary to popular belief, Lorem Ipsum is not simply random text. It has roots in a piece of classical Latin literature from 45 BC, making it over 2000 years old. Richard McClintock, a Latin professor at Hampden-Sydney College in Virginia, looked up one of the more obscure Latin words, consectetur, from a Lorem Ipsum passage, and going through the cites of the word in classical literature, discovered the undoubtable source. Lorem Ipsum comes from sections 1.10.32 and 1.10.33 of &#8220;de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum&#8221; (The Extremes of Good and Evil) by Cicero, written in 45 BC. This book is a treatise on the theory of ethics, very popular during the Renaissance. The first line of Lorem Ipsum, &#8220;Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet..&#8221;, comes from a line in section 1.10.32.</p>
<p>The standard chunk of Lorem Ipsum used since the 1500s is reproduced below for those interested. Sections 1.10.32 and 1.10.33 from &#8220;de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum&#8221; by Cicero are also reproduced in their exact original form, accompanied by English versions from the 1914 translation by H. Rackham.</p>
<p>There are many variations of passages of Lorem Ipsum available, but the majority have suffered alteration in some form, by injected humour, or randomised words which don&#8217;t look even slightly believable. If you are going to use a passage of Lorem Ipsum, you need to be sure there isn&#8217;t anything embarrassing hidden in the middle of text. All the Lorem Ipsum generators on the Internet tend to repeat predefined chunks as necessary.</p>
<p><strong>The standard Lorem Ipsum passage, used since the 1500s</strong><br />
&#8220;Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Section 1.10.32 of &#8220;de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum&#8221;, written by Cicero in 45 BC</strong><br />
&#8220;Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>1914 translation by H. Rackham</strong><br />
&#8220;But I must explain to you how all this mistaken idea of denouncing pleasure and praising pain was born and I will give you a complete account of the system, and expound the actual teachings of the great explorer of the truth, the master-builder of human happiness. No one rejects, dislikes, or avoids pleasure itself, because it is pleasure, but because those who do not know how to pursue pleasure rationally encounter consequences that are extremely painful. Nor again is there anyone who loves or pursues or desires to obtain pain of itself, because it is pain, but because occasionally circumstances occur in which toil and pain can procure him some great pleasure. To take a trivial example, which of us ever undertakes laborious physical exercise, except to obtain some advantage from it? But who has any right to find fault with a man who chooses to enjoy a pleasure that has no annoying consequences, or one who avoids a pain that produces no resultant pleasure?&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Section 1.10.33 of &#8220;de Finibus Bonorum et Malorum&#8221;, written by Cicero in 45 BC</strong><br />
&#8220;At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga. Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi optio cumque nihil impedit quo minus id quod maxime placeat facere possimus, omnis voluptas assumenda est, omnis dolor repellendus. Temporibus autem quibusdam et aut officiis debitis aut rerum necessitatibus saepe eveniet ut et voluptates repudiandae sint et molestiae non recusandae. Itaque earum rerum hic tenetur a sapiente delectus, ut aut reiciendis voluptatibus maiores alias consequatur aut perferendis doloribus asperiores repellat.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>1914 translation by H. Rackham</strong><br />
&#8220;On the other hand, we denounce with righteous indignation and dislike men who are so beguiled and demoralized by the charms of pleasure of the moment, so blinded by desire, that they cannot foresee the pain and trouble that are bound to ensue; and equal blame belongs to those who fail in their duty through weakness of will, which is the same as saying through shrinking from toil and pain. These cases are perfectly simple and easy to distinguish. In a free hour, when our power of choice is untrammelled and when nothing prevents our being able to do what we like best, every pleasure is to be welcomed and every pain avoided. But in certain circumstances and owing to the claims of duty or the obligations of business it will frequently occur that pleasures have to be repudiated and annoyances accepted. The wise man therefore always holds in these matters to this principle of selection: he rejects pleasures to secure other greater pleasures, or else he endures pains to avoid worse pains.&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://chrisstormer.com/2006/08/07/lorem-ipsum-what-is-it/">Lorem Ipsum &#8211; What is it?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://chrisstormer.com">Chris Stormer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/08/07/lorem-ipsum-what-is-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Site Score Optimization</title>
		<link>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/25/site-score-optimization/</link>
		<comments>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/25/site-score-optimization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stormer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[This Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/25/site-score-optimization/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So a week or so ago I setout to score a 10.0 on sitescore for accessiblity.. I thought hey I can figure out the British Disability Act and meet their standards.  I&#8217;m happy to report I&#8217;ve far exceeding my own expectations in accessiblity&#8230; with the added bonus of doing pretty good in experience and [...]<p><a href="http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/25/site-score-optimization/">Site Score Optimization</a> is a post from: <a href="http://chrisstormer.com">Chris Stormer</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a week or so ago I setout to score a 10.0 on sitescore for accessiblity.. I thought hey I can figure out the British Disability Act and meet their standards.  I&#8217;m happy to report I&#8217;ve far exceeding my own expectations in accessiblity&#8230; with the added bonus of doing pretty good in experience and design.</p>
<p><a href="http://chrisstormer.com/wp-content/uploaded_images/7.24.06-sitescore.gif"><img src="http://chrisstormer.com/wp-content/uploaded_images/_7.24.06-sitescore.gif" width="400" height="78" alt="sitescore" title="sitescore" border="0"  /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/25/site-score-optimization/">Site Score Optimization</a> is a post from: <a href="http://chrisstormer.com">Chris Stormer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/25/site-score-optimization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sitepoint: Disabilities Discrimination Act</title>
		<link>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/19/sitepoint-disabilities-discrimination-act/</link>
		<comments>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/19/sitepoint-disabilities-discrimination-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stormer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/19/sitepoint-disabilities-discrimination-act/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So this site is generally 99% W3 HTML and CSS Complaint, but my sitescore is only a 8.8 out of 10.0 for design because I&#8217;m failing the Disabilities Discrimination Act from Britian.  I&#8217;m all for accessability my point here is why in the world is Sitepoint using this obscure act to test design?  [...]<p><a href="http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/19/sitepoint-disabilities-discrimination-act/">Sitepoint: Disabilities Discrimination Act</a> is a post from: <a href="http://chrisstormer.com">Chris Stormer</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this site is generally 99% W3 HTML and CSS Complaint, but my sitescore is only a 8.8 out of 10.0 for design because I&#8217;m failing the Disabilities Discrimination Act from Britian.  I&#8217;m all for accessability my point here is why in the world is Sitepoint using this obscure act to test design?  It&#8217;s extremely hard to even TEST for viability under this British law, let alone actually comply.  So here I am marking it on the calander I am an 8.8 and my goal of the next couple days will be to increase this score.  I will also be doing my best to shrink the size of my CSS and flesh out the empty categories.  Which tend to also be something that is upsetting the sitepoint score.  </p>
<p>7/19/06 &#8211; Design Score 8.8</p>
<p><a href="http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/19/sitepoint-disabilities-discrimination-act/">Sitepoint: Disabilities Discrimination Act</a> is a post from: <a href="http://chrisstormer.com">Chris Stormer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/19/sitepoint-disabilities-discrimination-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/</link>
		<comments>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 15:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stormer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look! - No WWW on this site.  Why?

In order to answer this question, we must first recall the definition of WWW:

    World Wide Web:
    n. Abbr. WWW
    1) The complete set of documents residing on all Internet servers that use the HTTP protocol, accessible to users via a simple point-and-click system.
    2) n : a collection of internet sites that offer text and graphics and sound and animation resources through the hypertext transfer protocol. 

By default, all popular Web browsers assume the HTTP protocol. In doing so, the software prepends the 'http://' onto the requested URL and automatically connect to the HTTP server on port 80. Why then do many servers require their websites to communicate through the www subdomain? Mail servers do not require you to send emails to recipient@mail.domain.com. Likewise, web servers should allow access to their pages though the main domain unless a particular subdomain is required.

Succinctly, use of the www subdomain is redundant and time consuming to communicate. The internet, media, and society are all better off without it.

Oh... and one other thing, it's a SEO dirty little secrety, having www and a non.www page splits page rank, either make everything point toward www or remove it using your httaccess and watch your SEO improve.<p><a href="http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/">WWW &#8211; dep·re·cate (dep&#8217;ri-kat&#8217;)</a> is a post from: <a href="http://chrisstormer.com">Chris Stormer</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look! &#8211; No WWW on this site.  Why?</p>
<p>In order to answer this question, we must first recall the definition of WWW:</p>
<p><strong>World Wide Web:</strong><br />
n. Abbr. WWW</p>
<ol>
<li>The complete set of documents residing on all Internet servers that use the HTTP protocol, accessible to users via a simple point-and-click system.</li>
<li>n : a collection of internet sites that offer text and graphics and sound and animation resources through the hypertext transfer protocol.</li>
</ol>
<p>By default, all popular Web browsers assume the HTTP protocol. In doing so, the software prepends the &#8216;http://&#8217; onto the requested URL and automatically connect to the HTTP server on port 80. Why then do many servers require their websites to communicate through the www subdomain? Mail servers do not require you to send emails to recipient@mail.domain.com. Likewise, web servers should allow access to their pages though the main domain unless a particular subdomain is required.</p>
<p>Succinctly, use of the www subdomain is redundant and time consuming to communicate. The internet, media, and society are all better off without it.</p>
<p>One other thing, it&#8217;s a SEO dirty little secrety, having www and a non.www page splits page rank, either make everything point toward www or remove it using your httaccess and watch your SEO improve.</p>
<p><a href="http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/">WWW &#8211; dep·re·cate (dep&#8217;ri-kat&#8217;)</a> is a post from: <a href="http://chrisstormer.com">Chris Stormer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/09/www-dep%c2%b7re%c2%b7cate-depri-kat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Valid HTML &amp; CSS Why Bother?</title>
		<link>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/04/valid-html-css-why-bother/</link>
		<comments>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/04/valid-html-css-why-bother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2006 22:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Stormer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrisstormer.com/2006/07/04/valid-html-css-why-bother/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<center><img src="http://www.chrisstormer.com/wp-content/uploaded_images/validhtml.png" width="279" height="116" alt="" title="" /></center><br />

In today's internet we are seeing changes in coding styles faster then most people care to keep up with, everying for CSS 3.0 to AJAX interfaces are pushing the envelope  on a daily basis.  Validation is one of the major casuaties of all this "progress" that is floating around on the net these days.  When I set out to make this blog, I wanted to make it 100% HTML Valid, much easier said then done when using a CMS engine to power and organize the actual content.  The cooler the design the less likely that my code would validate.  I kept with it tho, and religiously would rework pages that didn't validate and except for maybe a couple minor pages on this blog, mostly it's 100% valid HTML and CSS.  Could it be better, certainly anybody that takes three seconds and looks at my code will snicker.. my CSS is completely unorganized, lackes serious documentation and is bloated and homely.. but there are no validation errors.  Why is this so important to me?

1. Search Engines - I do SEO for a living and honestly people it's just a matter of time before Google and the rest of the search engines start judging sites based on the validity of thier code, it just makes sense.  There are a million ways to manipulate SEO optimization, especially if your not following HTML &#038; CSS validation rules, by rewarding well written and coded sites, the SE's will eventually be able to remove things like text color being set to the same color as the background or fonts being so small they can't be read.

2. Cross Browser Compliance - It's about 20000x easier to fix problems when your code doesn't have any "seroius" flaws to begin with.

3. Faster load times - look if your coding correctly it makes everything easier on everybody. It's that simple... writing good code won't slow things down.  The less tables, the less fixing a browser has to do, the better. Want a fast site, start with clean valid code.  (I'm still working on the clean part.)

4. Geek Factor - Finally the coolest and most important reason, coding valid code is cool, it's beautiful and it's poetry.  Respect your code, love it.. cherish it, your going to take a lot of time writing and working with it, take time to make it as valid as possible.  In the end having the little green checkmark for valid code is a very rewarding feeling.
<p><a href="http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/04/valid-html-css-why-bother/">Valid HTML &amp; CSS Why Bother?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://chrisstormer.com">Chris Stormer</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://www.chrisstormer.com/wp-content/uploaded_images/validhtml.png" width="279" height="116" alt="" title="" /></center></p>
<p>In today&#8217;s internet we are seeing changes in coding styles faster then most people care to keep up with, everying for CSS 3.0 to AJAX interfaces are pushing the envelope  on a daily basis.  Validation is one of the major casuaties of all this &#8220;progress&#8221; that is floating around on the net these days.  When I set out to make this blog, I wanted to make it 100% HTML Valid, much easier said then done when using a CMS engine to power and organize the actual content.  The cooler the design the less likely that my code would validate.  I kept with it tho, and religiously would rework pages that didn&#8217;t validate and except for maybe a couple minor pages on this blog, mostly it&#8217;s 100% valid HTML and CSS.  Could it be better, certainly anybody that takes three seconds and looks at my code will snicker.. my CSS is completely unorganized, lackes serious documentation and is bloated and homely.. but there are no validation errors.  Why is this so important to me?</p>
<p>1. Search Engines &#8211; I do SEO for a living and honestly people it&#8217;s just a matter of time before Google and the rest of the search engines start judging sites based on the validity of thier code, it just makes sense.  There are a million ways to manipulate SEO optimization, especially if your not following HTML &#038; CSS validation rules, by rewarding well written and coded sites, the SE&#8217;s will eventually be able to remove things like text color being set to the same color as the background or fonts being so small they can&#8217;t be read.</p>
<p>2. Cross Browser Compliance &#8211; It&#8217;s about 20000x easier to fix problems when your code doesn&#8217;t have any &#8220;seroius&#8221; flaws to begin with.</p>
<p>3. Faster load times &#8211; look if your coding correctly it makes everything easier on everybody. It&#8217;s that simple&#8230; writing good code won&#8217;t slow things down.  The less tables, the less fixing a browser has to do, the better. Want a fast site, start with clean valid code.  (I&#8217;m still working on the clean part.)</p>
<p>4. Geek Factor &#8211; Finally the coolest and most important reason, coding valid code is cool, it&#8217;s beautiful and it&#8217;s poetry.  Respect your code, love it.. cherish it, your going to take a lot of time writing and working with it, take time to make it as valid as possible.  In the end having the little green checkmark for valid code is a very rewarding feeling.</p>
<p><a href="http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/04/valid-html-css-why-bother/">Valid HTML &amp; CSS Why Bother?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://chrisstormer.com">Chris Stormer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chrisstormer.com/2006/07/04/valid-html-css-why-bother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
